Posts Tagged ‘JPMorgan Chase’

Flood of foreclosures to hit hit the housing market

CNNMoney

The golden age for foreclosure squatters may soon be coming to an end now that the $26 billion mortgage settlement has been approved.

Read the full story
http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/13/real_estate/foreclosures/index.htm?iid=Lead

Enhanced by Zemanta

Big banks easing terms on loans deemed as risks

Two of the nation’s biggest lenders, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, are quietly modifying loans for tens of thousands of borrowers who have not asked for help but whom the banks deem to be at special risk.

Read the full story
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/03/business/03loans.html?_r=1&ref=realestate

Enhanced by Zemanta

Loan modification elude local homeowners

By Robert Lewis
rlewis@sacbee.com
Published: Monday, Jan. 17, 2011 – 12:04 am | Page 1A
For nearly five years, from 2000 to 2005, Vera Jackson drove every workday from her home on a well-manicured Elk Grove street to the hair salon she owned and operated in Sunnyvale.

It was a price she thought worth paying to own her own home, an unattainable goal in the pricey Bay Area. On the commute, she often brought along her father, who suffered from Alzheimer’s and needed looking after. The pair slept at a motel in Sunnyvale when she was too tired to drive.

“I wanted the American dream,” Jackson said.

Now, 10 years after moving to Elk Grove, Jackson is like millions of other Americans buried by the subprime mortgage crisis and ensuing recession: She’s fighting to keep her home.

For months, Jackson has struggled to get her mortgage servicer, Bank of America, to modify the terms of her loan.

Interviews with Jackson and other homeowners illustrate how hard it remains for many people to get their loans permanently modified and avoid foreclosure, despite a variety of federal and state programs set up to help.

Lenders are reluctant to reduce the principal amount owed on loans – often the only thing that would allow people who have lost their jobs to keep their homes. In addition, many trial loan modifications never become permanent. Paperwork gets inexplicably lost.

A federal government-backed loan modification program, which offers the best terms for homeowners, has fallen short of its goals. A large percentage of homeowners receiving modifications from their loan servicers that aren’t backed by the government are falling back into trouble.

Adding to these impediments, some people who took out ill-advised mortgages now are making desperate financial decisions that only make things worse.

Jackson, for instance, has put her few remaining dollars into the sort of companies state attorneys general have been warning debt-ridden Americans to avoid.

She hired a debt settlement company named in a 2009 New York attorney general’s investigation to help her out from under the crushing weight of credit card debt. More recently, she hired a Southern California lawyer to help get her loan modified. The lawyer charged $500 to review her case and will bill nearly $2,000 more to file loan modification paperwork that nonprofit housing counselors file for free.

In a recent interview at her home – stacks of paperwork on her table – Jackson, 66, said she realizes she might be in trouble. But she’s desperate.

“I can barely make it now. You can’t get blood from a turnip, and I don’t want to hold up a bank.”
5.1 million in default

Loan servicers say they’ve worked hard to help their customers. Hope Now – an alliance of mortgage companies, investors and counselors – touts the fact that in 2010, loan modifications outpaced foreclosures.

Nearly 1.65 million loans were permanently modified nationwide from January through November 2010, compared with nearly 1 million foreclosure sales, according to Hope Now data released earlier this month.

But the scope of the problem remains enormous. About 5.1 million homeowners nationwide were behind at least 60 days on their mortgage payments as of Oct. 31, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

New figures RealtyTrac released last week show 2010 was a record year for foreclosure activity, and the Irvine-based researcher projects 2011 will be even worse.

Loan modifications “still take a long time. They’re still not happening at the level they probably should,” said Pam Canada, chief executive officer of NeighborWorks Sacramento, a nonprofit group that counsels homeowners facing foreclosure.

The federal government’s main effort to address the situation, the Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, has fallen short of its goal to help 3 million to 4 million homeowners by 2012, lowering their monthly housing payments to 31 percent of their gross monthly income.

Launched in early 2009, the program is on track to prevent 700,000 to 800,000 foreclosures, according to a federal report released last month.

The report laid much of the blame on a complicated multi-party system in which servicers sometimes have financial incentives to foreclose on homes and where other parties – such as secondary lenders or investors – can block modifications.

Rather than using the government-sponsored HAMP program, loan servicers are mostly steering borrowers into private modifications. From January through November 2010, about 70 percent of modifications were granted this way.

Such modifications are generally more expensive for borrowers. And federal figures show that homeowners in such arrangements are twice as likely to default as those in the government program.

Faith Schwartz, executive director of Hope Now, cautioned against reading too much into such statistics. Non-HAMP loan modifications have improved significantly over time, she said.
Borrower, beware

Even when homeowners get a trial modification through the HAMP program, more than likely it won’t be made permanent.

More than half of all trial HAMP modifications have ended without a homeowner receiving a permanent modification, according to Treasury Department data. And in more than three-quarters of cases, it wasn’t because they had missed a trial payment.

Robert Robinson of San Ramon said he never missed a payment in his trial modification from JPMorgan Chase – a deal that cut his payments in half, to $1,600.

Still, after three months, the bank told him he did not qualify for a permanent modification. On top of that, it said he owed thousands of dollars – the difference between the discounted monthly payment and what he would have paid without the trial modification. The lender also informed him that the discounted payments would be counted as delinquent, ruining his credit, he said.

“I was getting calls from my wife in tears saying ‘We’re going to lose our house,’ ” Robinson said. “I said ‘We can’t, we’ve been doing everything they said.’ “

A Chase spokeswoman said the bank is reviewing Robinson’s case to see what options are available.

Among the reasons servicers deny permanent modifications: Applications are deemed incomplete; borrowers don’t have enough debt to meet the program criteria; they fail the complex “Net Present Value” test. That test is essentially a formula that measures whether it’s cheaper for a mortgage company to foreclose than to modify a loan. If foreclosure makes more financial sense, the servicer can deny a modification.

As of June, federal regulators changed the rules to screen out more ineligible borrowers before they get into a trial modification.
A matter of principal

Some homeowners who have seen their incomes decline can’t afford a loan modification without having the amount they owe reduced, something banks have been reluctant to do.

Richard and Madelyne Moreno had hoped to persuade Bank of America to lower the balance on the $400,000, fixed-rate loan for the Rio Linda house they bought in February 2008. But after nearly a year of trying for a loan modification, they’re pursuing a short sale to avoid a foreclosure.

When they bought the house, the couple made more than $250,000 a year with their construction company. Work has all but dried up, and Richard has health problems. In 2010, Madelyne brought in about $47,000 – not enough to pay the mortgage.

Madelyne said she filled out numerous forms for BofA, mailed in records and was frustrated when low-level bank workers would tell her something was missing.

“I can’t even tell you how many times I sent the same things over and over,” she said.

After months of waiting, the Morenos learned last week that they don’t qualify for a HAMP modification; the bank scheduled a foreclosure sale for early February.

Bank of America did not return calls for comment.

But, as the new year begins, there are glimmers of hope for struggling borrowers.

In March 2010, the state announced it would start a program, supported with $2 billion in federal funds, to reduce loan balances and help unemployed people make their payments. The program’s first phase started last week. It’s unclear how many lenders will participate.

Paul Leonard, California director of the Center for Responsible Lending, said people are paying close attention to the investigation by state attorneys general into the mortgage servicing industry. Leonard said there’s hope the scrutiny will force servicers to beef up their loan modification programs.

Last month, Wells Fargo announced an agreement with the California attorney general’s office that calls for the bank to make billions of dollars worth of modifications statewide.

“It’s not too late,” Leonard said. “There are still a lot of foreclosures ahead of us.”
© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/01/17/3329181/loan-modifications-elude-local.html#ixzz1BMolYAdb

Enhanced by Zemanta

Mortgage Employment Index Off

By MortgageDaily.com
Published: Monday, Nov. 29, 2010 – 3:09 am

DALLAS, Nov. 29, 2010 — /PRNewswire/ — More than a half million people worked in mortgage lending as of October 2005 — the highest month on record. Five years later, fewer than half are left. Headcount in real estate finance fell by another thousand based on the Third-Quarter 2010 Mortgage Employment Index from MortgageDaily.com, a leading online news publication for the mortgage industry.

During the third quarter, 3,216 layoffs were tracked, worse than the second quarter’s 2,028, according to the report, which reflects data tracked by Mortgage Daily and is an indicator of overall mortgage employment activity.

Hirings also deteriorated, falling to 2,286 from the prior period’s 2,768.

The net effect was that there were 930 fewer people working in the mortgage sector than in the second quarter. Third-quarter activity also worsened from a year earlier.

Quarter Layoffs Hirings Net  
Q3 2010 3,216 2,286 -930  
Q2 2010 2,028 2,768 +740  
Q3 2009 5,401 4,691 -710  
       

 

In October 2005, near the end of the bull real estate market that eventually collapsed and sparked the Great Recession, mortgage employment peaked at 535,400 based on government data. In September 2010, industry-wide headcount had fallen to 246,400.

In 2007 alone, the Mortgage Employment Index fell by 87,131.

The decision to close Wells Fargo Financial Inc. had a huge impact on third-quarter activity. Without the loss of those jobs, the Mortgage Employment Index would have had a gain.

More than a hundred layoffs were reported for First Mortgage Corp. and Wealthbridge Mortgage.

Net gains of more than 200 occurred at JPMorgan Chase & Co., MetLife Bank and Neighborhood Assistance Corp.

Maryland, Illinois and Oregon had the biggest net losses in the third quarter, while more layoffs occurred in California than any other state.

North Carolina saw a net gain of more than 500 jobs — better than any of its 49 counterparts. Hundreds of hirings also happened in California and Texas.

The complete Mortgage Employment Index report — including full tables by state, year and company — is available at:  http://www.mortgagedaily.com/MortgageEmploymentIndex.asp?spcode=pr

Mortgage employment news, including articles about the Mortgage Employment Index, is available at: http://www.mortgagedaily.com/MortgageEmployment.asp?spcode=pr

About MortgageDaily.com

Founded in 1998, MortgageDaily.com provides online mortgage news and analysis for the mortgage industry. Around 1 million news pages are viewed monthly at MortgageDaily.com.

CONTACT:  
SamGarcia@MortgageDaily.com  
3811-700 Turtle Creek Blvd.  
Dallas, TX 75219  
 

 

SOURCE MortgageDaily.com

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/11/29/3218180/mortgage-employment-index-off.html#ixzz16jy0jLWJ

Enhanced by Zemanta 

Foreclosure mess overshadows JPMorgan earnings

Pallavi Gogoi, AP Business Writer, On Wednesday October 13, 2010, 6:18 pm EDT

NEW YORK (AP) — The last thing that top executives at JPMorgan Chase & Co. wanted to talk about Wednesday was the raging foreclosure mess.

“We’re not going to say too much about this today, other than the comments that we’re giving you here,” Chief Financial Officer Douglas Braunstein said on a conference call to discuss the company’s earnings.

That was wishful thinking.

Instead, analysts and investors wanted answers from Braunstein and CEO Jamie Dimon on the rapidly escalating foreclosure fiasco, which overshadowed an otherwise strong earnings report from the nation’s second-largest bank. JPMorgan’s profits increased 23 percent to $4.42 billion.

JPMorgan’s earnings came out on the same day that officials from all 50 states announced a joint investigation into accusations that lenders used flawed documents to foreclose on thousands of homeowners. JPMorgan, a big player in the mortgage market, said it was expanding its review of foreclosures from 23 to 41 states, and doubling the amount of cases under review to 115,000.

“We’re not evicting people who deserve to stay in the house,” Dimon declared. Dimon said he was hopeful that it would take three to four weeks for his bank to review the documents and get the foreclosure process back on track. However, he worried that “if it went on for a long period of time, it will have a lot of consequences, most of which would be adverse on everybody.”

JPMorgan Chase’s executives’ reluctance to talk too much about the foreclosure crisis is understandable. The latest crisis comes just as the anger over the U.S. bailout of large banks was fading. The allegations of shoddy work and document fraud on thousands of foreclosures that led to people being evicted from their homes puts banks back again on the hot seat.

“Bank executives have been unwilling and unable to imagine the worst that could happen,” says Nancy Bush, bank analyst for NAB Research. “You think you’ve seen the worst, and then there’s worse.”

JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America Corp., and GMAC, recently halted foreclosures in multiple states after evidence emerged of fraud in the documentation process.

Though Dimon brushed it aside, at least two analysts expressed concern over the $1.3 billion increase in JPMorgan Chase’s litigation reserve to fight lawsuits, including those for mortgage-related matters.

In its third quarter, JPMorgan Chase posted a 23 percent gain in net income, mostly because it set aside less money to cover losses from bad loans. Revenues fell 15 percent to $24.3 billion in a sign that tighter regulations and a sluggish economy are taking a toll.

New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co., the first major bank to report third-quarter results, earned $1.01 per share in the three months ending in September, beating anlaysts’ expectations. It earned $3.59 billion, or 82 cents, during the same period last year.

JPMorgan Chase is the nation’s No. 2 bank by assets and holds a vast portfolio of consumer and business loans, making it a bellwether for the U.S. economy. A closer look at its results suggest that the degree of suffering is starting to abate for Americans struggling through the longest recession since the 1930s. In a positive sign, JPMorgan said fewer of its customers were late on payments on mortgages and credit cards.

That enabled JPMorgan Chase to set aside $1.55 billion to cover for losses its expects from mortgages and auto loans, less than half the $3.99 billion it recorded in the same period a year ago. Similarly, the bank set aside $1.63 billion for expected losses in its credit-card business, down sharply from $4.97 billion last year.

What’s worrisome for JPMorgan Chase’s future earnings prospects is the fact that recently enacted financial overhaul legislation is already starting put a dent on earnings and revenue. JPMorgan may not be as able to rely as heavily as it has in recent quarters on trading profits and fees from its investment banking business to offset losses from mortgages and credit-card lending.

“JPMorgan’s earnings power has decreased because of slowing investment bank trading and also slow growth in its loan book,” said Benjamin Wallace, a securities analyst at Grimes & Co in Westborough, Massachusetts, which holds JPMorgan shares.

Profit from investment banking, which includes underwriting stock and bond offerings and advising corporations on deals, fell 33 percent. The drop was due mainly to lower fees from stock offerings. Income from trading currencies, bonds and other fixed-income investments fell 38 percent as interest rates remained at historic lows.

Stephen Bernard contributed to this report.

Enhanced by Zemanta